- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:05:42 +0000 (UTC)
Henri already replied to this with what I'm about to say, but since I'm supposed to reply to all the comments... No offence Henri. :-) On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > I was wondering how "These XML documents may contain a DOCTYPE if > desired, but this is not required." would be possible. Especially since > the repition model requires the use of attributes of type ID and xml:id > is not yet REC. The "id" attribute on elements in the XHTML namespace has ID semantics regardless of the DOCTYPE. > It could be solved by either adding a line how the attribute named 'id' > in the null namespace when applied to an element in the XHTML namespace > should be treated (as type ID) or adding a DOCTYPE (DTD) that defines > that. The former is already done -- in WA1. It's out of scope of WF2, IMHO. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 05:05:42 UTC