- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:51:16 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, James Graham wrote: > > I think the need to point this out implies that the condition (and the > wording of the condition) is too complex for most authors to understand > (and it's clear that no UA will enforce such a condition). Therefore the > paragraph as it stands benefits no-one and I suggest altering the > wording, at least. Ok, how about this: | The children of a form element must be block-level elements, unless one | of the ancestors of the form element is an element other than div whose | content model includes both block- and inline-level content, in which | case either block-level or inline-level content is allowed (but not | both). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 04:51:16 UTC