- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:36:11 +0100
Ian Hickson wrote: > The UA should not be required to provide such an ability. All radio > buttons being unchecked in a group is an error condition. However if > the UA wants to provide it, that's a UA thing. It is in error? Let me quote something: # Radio buttons in sets where none of the buttons are marked as checked # must all be initially left unchecked by the UA (which differs from # the behavior described in [RFC1866], but more accurately represents # common implementation and author needs). (That it is considered "very poor UI" is nice, but not really that will scare away authors.) If you allow them to be unchecked initially and a user accidently checks one which needs to be unchecked for that particular user he/she has a problem. The current description would allow that to happen. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 04:36:11 UTC