- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:24:05 -0500
Jim Ley wrote: > No, please see all the previous unconcluded discussion, I'm very much > in favour of Mathews proposal here, it does a very good job of > addressing the fallback problems with dates. Thanks. I believe some of the fallback concerns that <format> addresses were originally brought up by you in the mailing list. The one thing that still concerns me about my <format> suggestion is how browsers should parse the contents of a <format> element. We don't want different browsers processing the string differently, yielding browser-dependent date/time formats. Any suggestions?
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 10:24:05 UTC