- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:47:07 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Jim Ley wrote: > > > > Not a very big deal IMHO, I don't think hasFeature really works anyway. > > It doesn't, can we please not bother with it? I'd be more than happy to drop hasFeature(), but I've been asked to have it by DOM people. It probably won't do any harm. (FWIW, the spec says basically any UA can return true; it's not a test of conformance, but of intention. As you say, you wouldn't be able to test conformance.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 04:47:07 UTC