W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2005

[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Implementation choices

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:47:07 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501211242561.13468@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Jim Ley wrote:
> >
> > Not a very big deal IMHO, I don't think hasFeature really works anyway.
>
> It doesn't, can we please not bother with it?

I'd be more than happy to drop hasFeature(), but I've been asked to have 
it by DOM people. It probably won't do any harm. (FWIW, the spec says 
basically any UA can return true; it's not a test of conformance, but of 
intention. As you say, you wouldn't be able to test conformance.)

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 04:47:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:20 UTC