W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2005

[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Feedback

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:42:54 +0100
Message-ID: <16862.30142.745364.627650@howcome.oslo.opera.com>
Also sprach Matthew Thomas:

 > > When I read the arguments for <b> and <i>, I like to think of them as
 > > backwards-compatible synonyms for <strong> and <em>, respectively.
 > > Whether or not to keep <b> and <i> themselves is a choice of backwards
 > > compatibility over better-named semantic elements, IMO. But one must
 > > realize that they are just that--semantic elements (<strong> and <em>,
 > > that is).
 > That belief is widespread, but completely misinformed. <strong> and 
 > <em> have existed since the first HTML draft spec, right next to <b> 
 > and <i>. 

Almost, but not quite. The initial design did not include b/i or


Tim Berners-Lee commented on this issue in an early message:

  Comparing MIME's rich text and HTML, I see that we lack the
  characetr formatting attributes BOLD and ITALIC but on the other
  hand I feel that our treatment of logical heading levels and other
  structures is much more powerful and has turned out to provide more
  flexible formatting on different platforms than explicit
  semi-references to font sizes. This is born out by all the systems
  which use named styles in preference to explicit formatting, LaTeX
  or other macros instead of TeX, etc etc.


I quote this just to get history right, I'm not arguing any point.

 > HTML has always been a mixture of semantic elements for common 
 > semantics, and presentational elements for everything else. That 
 > combination has allowed it to remain both semantic enough for device 
 > independence and aggregation, and simple enough for popular use.


              H?kon Wium Lie                          CTO ??e??
howcome at opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Friday, 7 January 2005 03:42:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:38 UTC