- From: Sander Tekelenburg <tekelenb@euronet.nl>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 19:00:16 +0100
How does all this menus stuff relate to the LINK element? I'm getting the feeling that this might kill the best of what the LINK element has to offer: ease of navigation through recognisability. Most websites use "menus" for navigation. Every website presents this differently, even though often semantically they are the same. The LINK element has the advantage of allowing users to recognise such navigation easily, because the same browser will present those LINKs the same on every website. A practical problem is that some browsers still don't support LINK (most notably Safari and IE), which 'forces' web publishers to duplicate those links in the body. That in turn leaves little incentive for web publishers to even bother offering LINK-based navigation. The end user loses. They now need to figure out basic navigation on each and every website anew. I'm getting the feeling that the proposed "menu" here could take this both ways: it could move web publishers even further away from LINK by offering an entirely new mechanism to create navigation menus - the end users loses (because every site's navigation will be different) ; it could be defined in such a way that it would enhance LINK - the end user wins. So I feel that a definition of "menu" should promote the use of LINK. It could do so by stating that "menu" (or perhaps only a subset, "menu type=navigation") should get its contents from LINK elements. That way web publishers wouldn't need to dupicate navigational links anymore and user-agents could allow users to decide whether to present such menus inline in accordance with the site's suggested presentation (CSS), or in the sort of toolbar that current browsers offer for LINK. I realise that a downside would be that it would make mark-up a bit more complicated for non-professionals. OTOH, more and more websites are generated by automated systems these days, for which it would be dead-easy to mark things up this way automatically. For those of you who don't know it, here's what I wrote about LINK and navigation 5 years ago: <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/WWW/LINK/> -- Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>
Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 10:00:16 UTC