- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:17:04 +0100
On 4/25/05, Brad Neuberg <bradneuberg at yahoo.com> wrote: > > If successful shipped implementations is what > > matters, then there's > > lots of successful IE extensions that do the same as > > canvas and other > > elements which it would be much more sensible to go > > with. > > I'm not against that; I thought one of the ideas > behind the WHAT working group is to take already > working defacto standards and simply specify them and > implement them in other browsers, such as innerHTML > and XmlHttpRequest. I'd much rather choose an already > existing, if not perfect, canvas or drawable surface > type defacto standard than create an imaginary > "perfect" one like we seem to be doing on this list. > Running code is king.... Great, lets go with VML, supported on the majority of desktops out there, used by high profile sites such as Google, It's a much better option albeit more complicated than canvas. Jim.
Received on Monday, 25 April 2005 01:17:04 UTC