- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:59:21 +0200
Ian Hickson wrote: > I've added an example. Ok, so order isn't important. You want to add a closing DFN tag by the way. (To the example.) >> * 2.6.12. The kbd element >> >> How can this element only be used in strictly inline-level content >> but sometimes contain inline-level content. That doesn't work. > > I'm confused about what you mean here. "inline-level content" > includes "strictly inline-level content". Well, the draft states (this is SAMP): # Contexts in which this element may be used: # Where strictly inline-level content is allowed. So it may only be used in strictly inline-level context, right? How can otherwise ever apply: # Content model: # When used in an element whose content model is only strictly # inline-level content: only strictly inline-level content. # Otherwise: any inline-level content. ..? >> * 2.6.15. The q element >> >> It looks like this has the same problem as 2.6.12. (A Q element to >> contain a BLOCKQUOTE?) > > I don't understand the problem. If the person you are quoting was > themselves quoting a block from elsewhere, where's the problem? Like <q>foo bar and then <cite>Ian</cite> said: <blockquote> <p>Well, I don't want to go into details right now...</p> <p>... but this looks like a very ugly markup construct...</p> </blockquote> however, he was of course wrong, as this kind of nesting is actually kind a cool, not?</q> ..? It looks terrible imho. Not something you put inline or so. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2005 05:59:21 UTC