- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:38:20 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Olav Junker Kj?r wrote: > > > > There's no use case for this. It just has to be defined so that we get > > interoperable behaviour, otherwise every UA will end up doing > > something different. > > Yes, I understand your reluctance to have unspecified behavior. I think > it might be useful to have a note saying "you are not supposed to do > this" in these cases, so the reader won't lose sleep trying to figure > out why the features is included in the spec. Well, you might want to dynamically create a <select>. You're not not supposed to do it, but you're not particularily supposed to do it either. It's just one of the many things that have to be defined. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 06:38:20 UTC