W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2005

Call four comments 4 is out (Was: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 submission to W3C)

From: Olav Junker Kjr <olav@olav.dk>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:24:13 +0200
Message-ID: <425D1D7D.7030305@olav.dk>
Generally, I think the short usage notes improves the spec a lot. 
Suddely the javascript: date: and file: schemes make sense to me!

 > There's no use case for this. It just has to be defined so that we get
 > interoperable behaviour, otherwise every UA will end up doing
 > something different.

Yes, I understand your reluctance to have unspecified behavior. I think 
it might be useful to have a note saying "you are not supposed to do 
this" in these cases, so the reader won't lose sleep trying to figure 
out why the features is included in the spec.

Olav Junker Kj?r
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 06:24:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:40 UTC