[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 submission to W3C

Ian Hickson wrote:
> It is good news. 

Congratulations then! :-)

> It is the first step to working with the W3C to move the 
> development of the WHATWG specifications into the W3C fold, while keeping 
> the open nature of the WHATWG development process.

Thats cool, but isn't this going to delay the spec for years?

I actually agree with W3C that XForms is much more powerful and elegant 
that WF2, I just think that WF2 is interesting because it has a hope of 
being practically usable and used on the world wide web in the near 
future. Without this possibility, WF2 really hasn't much going for it 
compared to XForms. Or am I to pessimistic?

regards
Olav Junker kj?r

Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 03:56:38 UTC