- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:56:04 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Mark Schenk wrote: > > In section 2.1 an example is given of the newly introduced attributes, > which has me confused a bit. It concerns the following lines: [...] Oops. Those should all be in th elong format. Fixed. (Although maybe we should allow the shorter format? I keep going back and forth on this. Now that the format is defined in the spec, it would be easier to allow trimming of seconds and milliseconds.) > Or should I look for the answer in the line "All the numbers must be in > base ten and zero-padded if necessary." so that the UA should take 8:00 > and add zeros to it to get the official format? No, that's talking about the format, not the interpretation of the format. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2004 12:56:04 UTC