- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:47:14 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Malcolm Rowe wrote: >>> >>> As you point out, we do also have the option of using both: a text box >>> paired with a select, in some form. While that provides the right >>> functionality in legacy clients, it'd be quite complex to author and use >>> (at the server-side), and I'd imagine, very complex for UA authors to >>> support. >> Yeah, I'm not sure it's worth the effort. > > The functionality in general, or pairing an input and select specifically? > If the latter, I agree. If the former, well, it'd be a pity, but if we can't > come up with something acceptable .. The second one. I am thinking we should remove <select editable> from this version of the draft, though. At least until we have a more concrete proposal. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 25 June 2004 08:47:14 UTC