- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:48:16 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Jim Ley wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:03:49 +0100, Malcolm Rowe wrote: >> >> The intention is to support all legacy browsers, including things like lynx. > > That is not what Ian said before. Please see the previous discussion. You are talking at cross-purposes. WF2 has to gracefully degrade in Lynx, but it doesn't have to be supported in Lynx in such a way that all the new features work without having to upgrade Lynx. >> How is WHATWG 'controlled by 2 browser vendors'? I'm not a browser >> vendor, except in the limited case that I sometimes contribute to >> Mozilla. Ditto for fantasai, and yourself. > > You're not listed as a member of the WHATWG, is this list out of date > now? I think Malcolm was pointing out that his feedback (as yours) has directly affected the spec in positive ways, despite his not being a browser vendor. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 25 June 2004 05:48:16 UTC