- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:28:58 +0100
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:03:49 +0100, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-what at farside.org.uk> wrote: > The intention is to support all legacy browsers, including things like lynx. That is not what Ian said before. Please see the previous discussion. > Suggesting that we're all trying to break backwards compatibility to force > people to adopt Opera is laughable. I never suggested that, I suggested where Opera has a near monopoly (which it does on a some platforms) we'd be forced to upgrade at a cost to a new version, if the WF2 did not degrade gracefully on those user agents, as it looks so far, it doesn't, and Ian has stated that only IE6 is important. > How is WHATWG 'controlled by 2 browser vendors'? I'm not a browser vendor, > except in the limited case that I sometimes contribute to Mozilla. Ditto for > fantasai, and yourself. You're not listed as a member of the WHATWG, is this list out of date now? Jim.
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 08:28:58 UTC