- From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-what@farside.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:33:05 +0100
Jim Ley writes: > javascript is not an acceptable solution for the legacy UA's, (Just so we're clear - I agree with that bit) > server-side processing of the form perhaps, but mandating a server and > HTTP for WF2 forms is I think inappropriate, not all HTML usage has a > server for navigation. But not this bit. What on earth are you going on about? WF2 is an extension for *forms*. If you're using HTML4 forms, you almost certainly have a server to submit the data to. Ditto for WF2. I agree that it is possible to have HTML4 form controls without a server, but the same is true for WF2. I just can't work out what you're trying to say. Regards, Malcolm
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 07:33:05 UTC