- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:44:35 +0200
Malcolm Rowe wrote: > fantasai writes: > >>> If I may I'd like to suggest the following public identifiers instead: >>> "-//WHATWG//DTD HTML 4.01 plus Web Forms 2.0//EN" >> >> >> There's no DTD, so it would be inappropriate to use a DTD FPI. >> Note the annotation: >> >> # The DOCTYPE will change before this specification is finalised. > > > I don't know much about DTD's (beyond how to read one), but is there any > reason we wouldn't want to create a DTD and then use the DOCTYPE Dave > suggested? There's a reason we don't have one yet: we haven't written it yet. ~fantasai -- http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact
Received on Friday, 18 June 2004 01:44:35 UTC