- From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-what@farside.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:13:02 +0100
fantasai writes: >> If I may I'd like to suggest the following public identifiers instead: >> "-//WHATWG//DTD HTML 4.01 plus Web Forms 2.0//EN" > > There's no DTD, so it would be inappropriate to use a DTD FPI. > Note the annotation: > > # The DOCTYPE will change before this specification is finalised. I don't know much about DTD's (beyond how to read one), but is there any reason we wouldn't want to create a DTD and then use the DOCTYPE Dave suggested? Thanks, Malcolm
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2004 14:13:02 UTC