- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:56:57 +0200
>> Since XHTML 1.1 is based on the modularization, I'm not sure if it >> would be appropriate to extend it in this way. > > Perhaps I misunderstand, but I thought one of the reasons for the > Modularization of XHTML 1.0 Recommendation is to facilitate extending > XHTML like this. Correct, see below. >> The XHTML forms module should probably be updated and a new >> specification should be created. But then, the modularization was >> never supported anyway. > > IMHO the Web Forms 2.0 spec should ideally reuse the DTD and XSD modules > from Modularization of XHTML 1.0, combined with new Web Forms 2.0 > modules, to create a DTD and XSD without too much effort. :o) The problem is that (1) browser don't support modularization and (2) Web Forms 2.0 would probably need a namespace which is something the working group doesn't want iirc. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2004 10:56:57 UTC