- From: Dylan Schiemann <list4@dylanmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:11:30 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Thomas wrote: | On 14 Jun, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: |> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Dylan Schiemann wrote: |>> Ian Hickson wrote: |>>> I'm really stuck on this problem of how to handle running remote |>>> applications so they definitely look like they are remote, and an |>>> application on paypcl.com is definitely distinguishable from one on |>>> paypal.com, even if they use near-identical code. | | | Having read this whole thread, I don't see what preventing phishing has | to do with menu bars in particular, or even What-WG in general. Phishing | is an increasing problem with Web apps right now, even when they don't | use pull-down menus or any other fancy elements. | | Browser vendors could make phishing harder without requiring any user | intervention, but I'd rather not clutter this list with the technique | because it seems rather off-topic. I think the more relevant point is this: where is the line drawn for what permissions a web app can be afforded. Are we only coming up with ways to provide web sites with more application-like interfaces and options, or also a way for light-weight local apps to migrate to web apps? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAzdxC8nLgh/JJsxERAvdiAKCajDseDsDbEUuHho1IUQ2GhfGXzQCeJhBi 06tkVK6b6cwsPRj6JfNIRpA= =XVaM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 10:11:30 UTC