W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2004

[whatwg] Document Type Definition (DTD) for Web Forms 2.0 - Draft 1

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:32:17 +0200
Message-ID: <4100CD11.6070206@inkedblade.net>
Michael wrote:
> Greetings fantasai,
> 
> Methinks you missed a couple semi-colons...
> 
> <!ENTITY % InputType
>    %Buttons | %TypedInput; | %RepeatButtons )"
> should be...
>  %Buttons; | %TypedInput; | %RepeatButtons; )"

Oops. Fixed.

> Just my opinion -- you could kill the fontstyle entity. ;-)

Removing <TT> might be an option. I'm leaving in B and I under the
reasoning given in
http://mpt.net.nz/archive/2004/05/02/b-and-i
   | So if you want to use bold or italics, and HTML doesn?t have
   | a semantic element for what you mean, use b or i. If you?re
   | not sure which semantic element to use, use b or i. And if
   | you?re creating an authoring tool for people who won?t know
   | or care about semantics, please leave the semantic markup
   | alone, and just stick to b and i.

As for <small> (and /maybe/ <big>), we might have some other plans for it...

> Something that made no sense to me in the HTML 4.01 DTD: events on
> link and noscript elements.  Not sure how the repeat attributes
 > apply to these elements.

Hmm. I'd leave events on link because you can use CSS to make
it visible.

Ian, do we want to remove events on noscript?

~fantasai

-- 
http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact
Received on Friday, 23 July 2004 01:32:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:35 UTC