[whatwg] WEB_FORMS 2.0 comment, repetition model, using reserved macro scripting syntax

On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Andrew Clover wrote:
>
> 4. Square brackets are still pretty bad. You can't have them in an
> attribute of type ID

You can, you just can't have them there if you have a DTD and a validating
parser.


> Also they cause pain for PHP users and others who like to put literal
> square brackets in their names; the nbzwsp-hack is in insufficient
> workaround as it doesn't, AFAICS, allow PHP-[ and WF-[ to be mixed.

Why would PHP-[ and WF-[ not be able to be mixed?


> I believe the entire idea of repeat-sections to be an poor solution to a
> question that can already be better answered by plain old JavaScript.

JavaScript can, as Jim Ley likes to remind us, be disabled.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 08:52:38 UTC