- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:43:15 +0100
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 15:31:35 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote: > > The MUST here is excessive I think (it prevents me adding my own > > personal attributes > > Correct. Proprietary attributes must not be sent over the wire. So even though the property is supported in user agents, I cannot provide a modified stylesheet that includes WF2 (for example a WF2 and HTML 4.01 transitional, rather than strict) I think this is a shame, just like the WF2 can re-use the semantics of HTML 4.01, other WG's should be able to re-use the semantics of WF2. > But if an HTML-based WF2 document is sent as something other than > text/html, or has another DOCTYPE, then it is non-conformant. Meaning what? What are the conformance requirements on a WF2 viewer? > > An XHTML document would therefore not be able to be served as > > text/html, can you just clarify that this is deliberately meant to > > prevent the XHTML as Appendix C carrying on - and XHTML WF documents > > will be served as text/html would be a violation of the spec. > > Yes, that is exactly correct. Great! > For people who want to use XHTML, as I do on, e.g.: I don't really see the use case in WF2 terms. > ...or as Tom Pike does, e.g., on: > http://www.xiven.com/ > > ...or as Allan Clements does, e.g., on: > http://www.exploding-planet.com/ Oh great, more people who don't understand q values in Accept-headers, seen as I can't see these sites to find email addresses, could someone pass on exactly what q=0 means in an accept header... Jim.
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 08:43:15 UTC