W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2004

[whatwg] DOCTYPE shouldn't be optional (fwd)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 15:39:55 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407091538470.11240@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:34:28 -0400, Matthew Raymond wrote:
>>
>> I believe Mozilla, Opera and Safari all support XHTML, so why would
>> employees of these companies define a standard that requires them to
>> treat HTML and XHTML differently?
>
> Because they already have to be and are being treated differently.

The differences are basically limited to the parser code. The majority of
the code for XHTML and HTML is shared in most implementations of XHTML and
HTML. Every difference is a pain to implement. Which is why we don't want
to add any more differences.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 08:39:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:35 UTC