- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:34:28 -0400
Jim Ley wrote: > So XHTML is not an XML document? I didn't say that. I said that XML is not an XHTML document. It's similar to how a square is a rectangle, but a rectangle is not a square. >> I don't see the logic in your reasoning. We should drop XHTML >>because Ian doesn't like it being used in the HTML MIME type? > > No, because WF2 is only relevant to legacy clients, and legacy clients > mostly only support text/html. I think you're forgetting the WF2 clients that support XHTML. Also, I believe Mozilla, Opera and Safari all support XHTML, so why would employees of these companies define a standard that requires them to treat HTML and XHTML differently?
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 07:34:28 UTC