[whatwg] DOCTYPE shouldn't be optional (fwd)

• From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
• Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 15:03:31 +0100
• Message-ID: <851c8d3104070907032ca05869@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:56:00 +0100, Jim Ley <jim.ley at gmail.com> wrote:

> If this is the case, why do we have XHTML version of the spec?

This should be _in_ the spec...

Jim.

Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 07:03:31 UTC