W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2004

[whatwg] DOCTYPE shouldn't be optional (fwd)

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 15:03:31 +0100
Message-ID: <851c8d3104070907032ca05869@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:56:00 +0100, Jim Ley <jim.ley at gmail.com> wrote:

> If this is the case, why do we have XHTML version of the spec?

This should be _in_ the spec...

Jim.
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 07:03:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:35 UTC