- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:17:38 -0400
Jim Ley wrote:
> An XHTML document would therefore not be able to be served as
> text/html, can you just clarify that this is deliberately meant to
> prevent the XHTML as Appendix C carrying on - and XHTML WF documents
> will be served as text/html would be a violation of the spec.
I think what Ian is saying here is that he is that the new text
refers to XML that uses the XHTML namespace, rather than XHTML specifically.
> If this is the case, why do we have XHTML version of the spec?
I don't see the logic in your reasoning. We should drop XHTML
because Ian doesn't like it being used in the HTML MIME type?
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 07:17:38 UTC