W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2004

[whatwg] DOCTYPE shouldn't be optional (fwd)

From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:17:38 -0400
Message-ID: <40EEA902.8050704@earthlink.net>
Jim Ley wrote:
> An XHTML document would therefore not be able to be served as
> text/html, can you just clarify that this is deliberately meant to
> prevent the XHTML as Appendix C carrying on - and XHTML WF documents
> will be served as text/html would be a violation of the spec.

    I think what Ian is saying here is that he is that the new text 
refers to XML that uses the XHTML namespace, rather than XHTML specifically.

> If this is the case, why do we have XHTML version of the spec?

    I don't see the logic in your reasoning. We should drop XHTML 
because Ian doesn't like it being used in the HTML MIME type?
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 07:17:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:35 UTC