- From: Dave Hodder <dmh@dmh.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:18:59 +0100
Matthew Raymond wrote: <snip/> > Using this method, you don't have to add in code that checks for WF2. > You simply encapsulate the <script> element in <ignore> and it becomes > inactive. Sounds good to me, although quite what is being <ignore>d seems a little ambiguous from the name of the element. It seems very similiar to the various <noscript>, <noembed>, <noframes> type tags -- so perhaps it could have a more descriptive name, e.g. <nowebforms version="2.0"> or <nowebforms2> or similiar? (Just a thought.) Regards, Dave
Received on Monday, 5 July 2004 14:18:59 UTC