- From: Jason Lustig <jasonlustig@adelphia.net>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 19:14:10 -0400
Jim Ley wrote: > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 14:02:36 -0400, Matthew Raymond > <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote: > >> Personally, I'm beginning to think we shouldn't worry about IE. We >>could just tell everyone running IE with Javascript disabled that if >>they want to use Web Apps 1.0, they either need JS turned on or they >>need to get a standards compliant browser. > > > Your audience for WF-2 is not IE users, it's web form authors, they're > the people you have to provide something new, they demand IE > compatibility, indeed most couldn't care about anything other than IE. That's not true. Perhaps WF-2 authors writings apps for the general internet will "demand" IE compatibility, however the VAST majority of web apps written, just like the vast majority of software written, is in-house software written for business' intranets. In those cases, which as I said is the vast majority of web apps written, they CAN demand that users (i.e. employees at the company) use a compliant browser - i.e., not IE (pun not intended :D). Jason
Received on Sunday, 4 July 2004 16:14:10 UTC