W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2004

[whatwg] Syntax Highlighting [was: several messages]

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:36:31 +0000
Message-ID: <851c8d3104121614365142a6a6@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:30:41 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
[me]
> > Nope, all that says is subsection or section, I asked, and got no answer
> > about what that means, does each section, e.g. "section 3" requier 2
> > interopable implementations, or does it just mean each subsection say
> > sub-section 3.4 needs 2 interopable implementations.
> 
> Depends, on a case by case basis. Obviously some subsections can't be
> tested separately, in which case sections are what matter. When
> subsections are independent of other subsections, they can be tested
> individually and then subsections are what matters.

Right, that's understandable, can we ensure that the final call for
implementations phase clearly marks what each section and subsection
is?

Jim.
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 14:36:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:38 UTC