- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:36:31 +0000
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:30:41 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: [me] > > Nope, all that says is subsection or section, I asked, and got no answer > > about what that means, does each section, e.g. "section 3" requier 2 > > interopable implementations, or does it just mean each subsection say > > sub-section 3.4 needs 2 interopable implementations. > > Depends, on a case by case basis. Obviously some subsections can't be > tested separately, in which case sections are what matter. When > subsections are independent of other subsections, they can be tested > individually and then subsections are what matters. Right, that's understandable, can we ensure that the final call for implementations phase clearly marks what each section and subsection is? Jim.
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 14:36:31 UTC