W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2004

[whatwg] Syntax Highlighting [was: several messages]

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:30:41 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412162228590.18787@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> > >>
> > >>   http://whatwg.org/charter#crec
> > >>
> > >> ...which has an even more strictly-defined process for exiting the 
> > >> call for implementations stage than the W3C does.
> > >
> > > Yeah, you never finished answering my questions about that, about 
> > > exactly what a feature was etc.
> > 
> > It is defined right there in the charter.
> 
> Nope, all that says is subsection or section, I asked, and got no answer 
> about what that means, does each section, e.g. "section 3" requier 2 
> interopable implementations, or does it just mean each subsection say 
> sub-section 3.4 needs 2 interopable implementations.

Depends, on a case by case basis. Obviously some subsections can't be 
tested separately, in which case sections are what matter. When 
subsections are independent of other subsections, they can be tested 
individually and then subsections are what matters.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 14:30:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:20 UTC