W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2004

[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Note Wording

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:28:52 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412162227340.18787@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Brad Fults wrote:
>
> In section 2.16 [1] of the Web Forms 2.0 draft there is the following note:
> 
> "Note: These names, and their exact semantics, differ from those of the 
> equivalent attribute in XForms 1.0 (the replace attribute on the 
> submission element). The equivalent of this specification's document is 
> equivalent to the XForms all, and the equivalent of values is instance. 
> The equivalent of the XForms none value is document with the server 
> returning an HTTP 204 No Content return code."
> 
> > "The equivalent of this specification's document is equivalent to the 
> > XForms all..."
>
> This seems redundant and awkward. Instead one might consider something 
> like, "The equivalent of document in this specification is all in 
> XForms..." or something to that effect.

Good idea, thanks.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 14:28:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:38 UTC