- From: Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:50:06 -0800
In section 2.16 [1] of the Web Forms 2.0 draft there is the following note: "Note: These names, and their exact semantics, differ from those of the equivalent attribute in XForms 1.0 (the replace attribute on the submission element). The equivalent of this specification's document is equivalent to the XForms all, and the equivalent of values is instance. The equivalent of the XForms none value is document with the server returning an HTTP 204 No Content return code." > "The equivalent of this specification's document is equivalent to the XForms all..." This seems redundant and awkward. Instead one might consider something like, "The equivalent of document in this specification is all in XForms..." or something to that effect. [1] - http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-forms/2004-12-10-call-for-comments/#extensions3 -- Brad Fults NeatBox
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 00:50:06 UTC