W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2004

[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Note Wording

From: Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:50:06 -0800
Message-ID: <1959130b04121400505ec4158d@mail.gmail.com>
In section 2.16 [1] of the Web Forms 2.0 draft there is the following note:

"Note: These names, and their exact semantics, differ from those of
the equivalent attribute in XForms 1.0 (the replace attribute on the
submission element). The equivalent of this specification's document
is equivalent to the XForms all, and the equivalent of values is
instance. The equivalent of the XForms none value is document  with
the server returning an HTTP 204 No Content return code."

> "The equivalent of this specification's document is equivalent to the XForms all..."
This seems redundant and awkward. Instead one might consider something
like, "The equivalent of document in this specification is all in
XForms..." or something to that effect.

[1] - http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-forms/2004-12-10-call-for-comments/#extensions3

-- 
Brad Fults
NeatBox
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 00:50:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:38 UTC