- From: dolphinling <dolphinling@myrealbox.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:18:58 -0500
Petrazickis wrote: > Matthew Raymond wrote: > >> Ian Hickson wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Matthew Raymond wrote: >>> >>>> Oh, I agree that for backwards compatibility sake, we need to >>>> support radio groups with no initial values. However, I see little >>>> reason not to recommend default radio buttons in either WF2 or WA1. >>>> (Probably the former.) >>> >>> >>> >>> You mean give a suggestion to authors? The spec already says "Authors >>> are recommended to always have one radio button selected. Having no >>> radio buttons selected, or more than one in a group selected, is >>> considered very poor UI." but I don't know what else we can do. >> >> > How about the following? > - The last radio button marked selected in a sequence will be the only > one considered selected by the UA. The UA will not allow for more than > one radio button to be selected at a time. > - If no radio button is marked selected, the UA will select the first > radio button. The UA will not allow for the absence of a selected radio > button. > The problem with that is that there are a whole ton of pages out there that use the absence of a selected button as a "choice" (usually a "do nothing" choice) instead of properly coding their pages to include that choice. Forcing a selected button would break all those pages, and no UA can afford the backlash that would create among users. The only thing I can think of is selecting one by default but allowing an unselect ability--but that would still be seen as a hassle by most of said users.
Received on Saturday, 11 December 2004 14:18:58 UTC