- From: Petrazickis <petrazi@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 16:45:22 -0500
Matthew Raymond wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Matthew Raymond wrote: >> >>> Oh, I agree that for backwards compatibility sake, we need to >>> support radio groups with no initial values. However, I see little >>> reason not to recommend default radio buttons in either WF2 or WA1. >>> (Probably the former.) >> >> >> You mean give a suggestion to authors? The spec already says "Authors >> are recommended to always have one radio button selected. Having no >> radio buttons selected, or more than one in a group selected, is >> considered very poor UI." but I don't know what else we can do. > How about the following? - The last radio button marked selected in a sequence will be the only one considered selected by the UA. The UA will not allow for more than one radio button to be selected at a time. - If no radio button is marked selected, the UA will select the first radio button. The UA will not allow for the absence of a selected radio button. -- Leons Petrazickis
Received on Saturday, 11 December 2004 13:45:22 UTC