- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:59:01 -0400
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2004, Matthew Thomas wrote: >>On 31 Jul, 2004, at 7:00 AM, Matthew Raymond wrote: >>>I recommend that, for HTML documents with the [WF2] doctype, there should >>>always be a default option selected, regardless if that default is >>>specified. >> >>I like that idea. > > I strongly disagree with adding more DOCTYPE-triggered behaviour changes. > Quirks mode is enough trouble as it is. We don't need yet-more code paths. > It makes testing hard. :-) How, then, do you justify changing the behavior of <label> with regards to passing events to the associated control? Clearly, with this change in behavior, browsers rendering documents that use <label> must determine the type of the document in order to be both HTML 4.01 and WF2 compliant. Are you suggesting that user agents that are compliant with WF2 should not be required to be compliant with HTML 4.01? For that matter, aren't we deliberately forcing UA vendors to choose between doctype-triggered behavior and HTML 4.01 nonconformance when the doctype identifies the document as specifically being HTML 4.01?
Received on Saturday, 21 August 2004 17:59:01 UTC