W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2004

[whatwg] Accesskey in Web Forms 2

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:36:53 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408220035320.20869@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004, Matthew Raymond wrote:
> 
> I don't think RENDERING of the access key should be optional.

It has to be. Google is a user agent. You can't require that google render 
access keys, that makes no sense. :-)


>> I also think that there should be an accesskey value which is basically
>> "auto", and which picks a non-clashing access key based on the element
>> content.
> 
> What's the purpose of this? Are there really situations where there are so
> many access keys that the webmaster doesn't want to bother with keeping track
> of them and just wants them auto-assigned?

I meant clashing with the browser's existing access keys, not clashing 
within the page.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 21 August 2004 17:36:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:36 UTC