W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2004

[whatwg] Suggested changes to Web Forms 2.0, 2004-07-01 working

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:25:56 +0100
Message-ID: <851c8d3104081903256f0f431@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:07:35 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote:

> > In any case, whether plug-ins are relevant or not to the approach, it
> > doesn't invalidate the point I was making.  The argument against OBJECT
> > so far relies on a particular DOM issue in a particular environment
> > against an assumption of a particular style of script support, that
> > should not be sufficient reason to reject it.
> It is sufficient.

Why?  Please explain the motivation for the decision, an open process
is not saying "it's sufficient" - Explain the decision.  So far we've
had other people say the idea is useful and should be considered, and
1 person say it's inappropriate - you, you've never justified other
than some dubious reasoning based on IE DOM properties.

Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 03:25:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:36 UTC