- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:07:35 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote: > > So you wish to specifically exclude the plug-in approach, why do you > wish to do this? In the opinion of Mozilla and Opera: | Any solution that cannot be used with the current high-market-share user | agent without the need for binary plug-ins is highly unlikely to be | successful. -- http://www.w3.org/2004/04/webapps-cdf-ws/papers/opera.html > In any case, whether plug-ins are relevant or not to the approach, it > doesn't invalidate the point I was making. The argument against OBJECT > so far relies on a particular DOM issue in a particular environment > against an assumption of a particular style of script support, that > should not be sufficient reason to reject it. It is sufficient. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2004 09:07:35 UTC