Re: Call for Consensus (CfC) on Adoption of the WebTransport specification

I support adopting the WebTransport draft as WebTransport WG deliverable.

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:39 PM Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I support adopting the WebTransport draft as WebTransport WG deliverable.
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 7:19 PM Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > I support adopting the WebTransport draft as WebTransport WG deliverable.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 7:39 PM Dragana Damjanovic <
> ddamjanovic@mozilla.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I support adopting the WebTransport draft as WebTransport WG
> deliverable.
> >>
> >> Dragana
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:47 AM Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ** We're re-doing this CfC due to lack of feedback (I only received
> one. Too busy with TPAC?) Please respond to the list. Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to adopt "WebTransport" as a
> WebTransport WG deliverable.
> >>>
> >>> Note that adoption as a WebTransport deliverable implies only that the
> specification is suitable as a starting point.
> >>>
> >>> This specification was incubated at WICG here
> https://wicg.github.io/web-transport
> >>> and has been migrated to https://w3c.github.io/webtransport
> >>> The current GitHub repository is here
> https://github.com/w3c/webtransport
> >>>
> >>> The use cases are available here (to be pulled into repo form):
> >>>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Hsu_uYfFCvTUE3cYA7tofr78p178gxWQKQLPHXONdRM
> >>>
> >>> The CfC will last for one week, and will end on Tuesday, November 17,
> 2020 at 21:00 UTC.
> >>> In response, please state one of the following:
> >>>
> >>>      I support adopting the WebTransport draft as WebTransport WG
> deliverable.
> >>>      I object to adopting the current WebTransport draft as a
> WebTransport WG deliverable, due to issues filed in open bug <#number>.
> >>>
> >>> Jan-Ivar, for the Chairs
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:44 PM Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to adopt "WebTransport" as a
> >>>> WebTransport WG deliverable.
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that adoption as a WebTransport deliverable implies only that the
> >>>> specification is suitable as a starting point.
> >>>>
> >>>> This specification was incubated at WICG here
> >>>> https://wicg.github.io/web-transport
> >>>> and has been migrated to https://w3c.github.io/webtransport
> >>>> The current GitHub repository is here
> https://github.com/w3c/webtransport
> >>>>
> >>>> The use cases are available here (to be pulled into repo form):
> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Hsu_uYfFCvTUE3cYA7tofr78p178gxWQKQLPHXONdRM
> >>>>
> >>>> The CfC will last for one week, and will end on Tuesday, October 27,
> >>>> 2020 at 21:00 UTC.
> >>>> In response, please state one of the following:
> >>>>
> >>>>      I support adopting the WebTransport draft as WebTransport WG
> >>>> deliverable.
> >>>>      I object to adopting the current WebTransport draft as a
> >>>> WebTransport WG deliverable, due to issues filed in open bug
> <#number>.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jan-Ivar, for the Chairs
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> .: Jan-Ivar :.
>
>
>
> --
> Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard
>