W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-websignage@w3.org > October 2015

Re: Proposal of new requirements for the Web-based signage toward W3C standard

From: Sangwhan Moon <sangwhan@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:39:51 +0900
Cc: "public-websignage@w3.org" <public-websignage@w3.org>
Message-Id: <78E5B0AE-9B6A-4A9B-A205-90399AD94DB5@iki.fi>
To: 김성혜 <shkim@etri.re.kr>
(Top posting as it'll be impossible to follow otherwise)

I'll have to discuss a bit with Hatano-san about this, but for now I think it might be better to allocate a separate slot
for the profiles and standards. I would strongly prefer it being a open discussion rather than a one-way presentation
though.

Let me open up a straw poll and send it to the list.

> On Oct 16, 2015, at 4:27 PM, 김성혜 <shkim@etri.re.kr> wrote:
> 
>  
>  
> We were planning to make short presentation so we could not make that presentation (alone) to day 2.
> It is OK with us if we are going to move several presentation together. 
> - Sung Hei
> 
> 보낸 사람 : "Sangwhan Moon" <sangwhan@iki.fi>
> 보낸 날짜 : 2015-10-16 15:57:29 ( +09:00 )
> 받는 사람 : 김성혜 <shkim@etri.re.kr>
> 참조 : public-websignage@w3.org <public-websignage@w3.org>
> 제목 : Re: Proposal of new requirements for the Web-based signage toward W3C standard
> 
> 
>> On Oct 16, 2015, at 2:11 PM, 김성혜 <shkim@etri.re.kr <mailto:shkim@etri.re.kr>> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ETRI would like to make short (10~15minutes) on the Emergency profile.
>> 
>> The title is as follows:  WDS Emergency profile : Status and future plan (ETRI)
>> 
>> You can check the agenda at the following path.
>> 
>> https://www.w3.org/community/websignage/wiki/Group_meeting_at_TPAC_2015 <https://www.w3.org/community/websignage/wiki/Group_meeting_at_TPAC_2015>
> I think it's better to allocate a separate slot for the profiles and specs. NTT brought up the power control
> specification, and I've heard the need of some other spec related topics. The 13:00 slot is probably better
> suited for discussing the overall group logistics.
> 
> How about we push all of those into a track on day 2? The last day is a bit slow, but we can make use of the
> morning timeframe since there is more than one non-logistics topic that has been brought up.
> 
> (Besides, most of our members are Japanese and Sapporo probably isn't magical enough to warrant going
> sightseeing in the afternoon. :-) )
> 
> Sangwhan


Received on Friday, 16 October 2015 07:40:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:23:29 UTC