W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-websignage@w3.org > May 2013

Re[2]: The title of the profile

From: Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 21:49:29 +0900
To: 현욱 <whyun@etri.re.kr>
Cc: public-websignage@w3.org
Message-Id: <20130518214929.36BE.17D6BAFB@newphoria.co.jp>
Hi Wook,

Thanks for your quick reply.
I'm glad that the current title is natural for you.
OK. Let's keep it unless the other members disagree.

Cheers,
Futomi

On Sat, 18 May 2013 11:54:19 +0000
현욱 <whyun@etri.re.kr> wrote:

> Hi, Futomi.
> 
> I'm sincerely grateful to your hard work.
> 
> My answers is inline.
> 
> 2013. 5. 18., ?붋 5:32, Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp>
>  먜렪:
> 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I proposed "Profiles for Web-based Signage Player" last month,
> > I've been working on it.
> > http://www.w3.org/community/websignage/wiki/Main_Page#Profiles_for_Web-based_Signage_Player
> > My draft is almost done.
> > I'll show you my draft in a few weeks.
> 
> Cool~! I'm really look forward to seeing it.
> 
> > But I'm not sure that the title is the best.
> > Specifically, I'm not sure that "Player" is appropriate.
> > When you hear the word "Player" in this context,
> > what do you imagine? Hardware? displays? STBs?
> > Is "Player" confusing?
> 
> I think it's appropriate to me. 
> Anyway, in my understanding, "player" reminds me of some kinds of software rather than hardware/display/STBs/
> 
> > How about dropping the word?
> > "Profiles for Web-based Signage"
> > I'd like to hear your opinions.
> > 
> 
> I vote to keep current title.
> "Profile for Web-based Signage" looks like that it should cover signage server, log server and local server as well as terminal. 
> 
> 
> Cheers,


--
Newphoria Corporation
Chief Technology Officer
Futomi Hatano
--
futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp
http://www.newphoria.co.jp/
Received on Saturday, 18 May 2013 12:49:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:23:27 UTC