- From: Çö¿í <whyun@etri.re.kr>
- Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 11:54:19 +0000
- To: Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp>
- CC: "<public-websignage@w3.org>" <public-websignage@w3.org>
Hi, Futomi. I'm sincerely grateful to your hard work. My answers is inline. 2013. 5. 18., ¿ÀÈÄ 5:32, Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp> ÀÛ¼º: > > Hi all, > > I proposed "Profiles for Web-based Signage Player" last month, > I've been working on it. > http://www.w3.org/community/websignage/wiki/Main_Page#Profiles_for_Web-based_Signage_Player > My draft is almost done. > I'll show you my draft in a few weeks. Cool~! I'm really look forward to seeing it. > But I'm not sure that the title is the best. > Specifically, I'm not sure that "Player" is appropriate. > When you hear the word "Player" in this context, > what do you imagine? Hardware? displays? STBs? > Is "Player" confusing? I think it's appropriate to me. Anyway, in my understanding, "player" reminds me of some kinds of software rather than hardware/display/STBs/ > How about dropping the word? > "Profiles for Web-based Signage" > I'd like to hear your opinions. > I vote to keep current title. "Profile for Web-based Signage" looks like that it should cover signage server, log server and local server as well as terminal. Cheers,
Received on Saturday, 18 May 2013 11:54:57 UTC