Re[2]: Use case 1

Hi all,

On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:29:48 +0200
"Chaals McCathieNevile" <w3b@chaals.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:05:38 +0200, Futomi Hatano  
> <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> > Thank you for your information, Chaals.
> >
> > Folks, I'd like to consider every possible way,and list all ways in the  
> > document.
> > http://www.html5.jp/Web-based-Signage/Scenarios-and-Use-Cases/#use-case-making-contents-using-a-declarative-approach
> 
> I don't think we should try to list every possible way - and when we ask  
> the HTML, SVG and other groups there may be other ways we still didn't  
> think of. It is still a good idea to list the possibilities we see.

My expression could be bad.
I have no thought to set a goal to list all solutions.
I don't think that we should list solutions for every use cases.
And I don't want to choose one of them as a decision as this group in the document.
I mean the *possibilities* as you say.
If we have some possibilities, we could see whether we need a requirement or not.
I think that gathering our ideas won't be harmful.
I believe that the effort will be useful.

Probably, some members in this group already have practical ways or ideas.
If they want to introduce their solutions, I don't want to deny it.

Of course, I know that this doesn't have priority.
We have to list use cases first of all.

What do you think, folks?
Shouldn't we list solutions (possibilities) you have in the document?


> We need to make sure that we are looking at the requirements for the use  
> case, before coming up with the solution. It is surprisingly tempting to  
> come up with the solution first, and then extract requirements for that  
> solution. (I think it is an inherent risk in the way engineers like to  
> solve problems :) ).

Unfortunately, I am not familiar with this topic.
Does anyone have an opinion about this topic?

Best regards,
Futomi



> > For now, there are three ways for Use case 1.
> >
> > * SMIL + new elements (proposed at the workshop)
> > * SMIL in SVG (given by Chaals)
> > * HTML5 data-* attributes + handling by JavaScript (my proposal)
> >
> > If you have any other ideas, please post your ideas.
> 
> A combination of timing based on SVG animation, <animate id="secondThing"  
> begin="firstThing.end"...> (I have used this for normal sequences and it's  
> easy, and I have done the parallel things by grouping), with javascript to  
> handle cases like swapping resources in and out. Although a lot of this  
> can already be done with normal SVG animation, actually.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> > Best regards,
> > Futomi
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:32:37 +0200
> > "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@myopera.com> wrote:
> >
> >> An alternative approach being proposed, essentially bringing the rest of
> >> SMIL into SVG. Don't know where the thread went but it is worth looking
> >> at. (IMHO it would make more sense to just add the SMIL elements).
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/mid/4F4306B0.3080103@mozilla.com
> >>
> >> cheers
> >>
> >> Chaals
> >>
> >> --
> >> Charles McCathie Nevile - private mail account
> >
> > --
> > Newphoria Corporation
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > Futomi Hatano
> > --
> > futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp
> > http://www.newphoria.co.jp/
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chaals - standards declaimer

-- 
株式会社ニューフォリア
取締役 最高技術責任者
羽田野 太巳 (はたの ふとみ)
futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp
http://www.newphoria.co.jp/

Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 01:33:08 UTC