- From: Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 10:32:48 +0900
- To: "Chaals McCathieNevile" <w3b@chaals.com>
- Cc: "public-websignage@w3.org" <public-websignage@w3.org>
Hi all, On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:29:48 +0200 "Chaals McCathieNevile" <w3b@chaals.com> wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:05:38 +0200, Futomi Hatano > <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Thank you for your information, Chaals. > > > > Folks, I'd like to consider every possible way,and list all ways in the > > document. > > http://www.html5.jp/Web-based-Signage/Scenarios-and-Use-Cases/#use-case-making-contents-using-a-declarative-approach > > I don't think we should try to list every possible way - and when we ask > the HTML, SVG and other groups there may be other ways we still didn't > think of. It is still a good idea to list the possibilities we see. My expression could be bad. I have no thought to set a goal to list all solutions. I don't think that we should list solutions for every use cases. And I don't want to choose one of them as a decision as this group in the document. I mean the *possibilities* as you say. If we have some possibilities, we could see whether we need a requirement or not. I think that gathering our ideas won't be harmful. I believe that the effort will be useful. Probably, some members in this group already have practical ways or ideas. If they want to introduce their solutions, I don't want to deny it. Of course, I know that this doesn't have priority. We have to list use cases first of all. What do you think, folks? Shouldn't we list solutions (possibilities) you have in the document? > We need to make sure that we are looking at the requirements for the use > case, before coming up with the solution. It is surprisingly tempting to > come up with the solution first, and then extract requirements for that > solution. (I think it is an inherent risk in the way engineers like to > solve problems :) ). Unfortunately, I am not familiar with this topic. Does anyone have an opinion about this topic? Best regards, Futomi > > For now, there are three ways for Use case 1. > > > > * SMIL + new elements (proposed at the workshop) > > * SMIL in SVG (given by Chaals) > > * HTML5 data-* attributes + handling by JavaScript (my proposal) > > > > If you have any other ideas, please post your ideas. > > A combination of timing based on SVG animation, <animate id="secondThing" > begin="firstThing.end"...> (I have used this for normal sequences and it's > easy, and I have done the parallel things by grouping), with javascript to > handle cases like swapping resources in and out. Although a lot of this > can already be done with normal SVG animation, actually. > > cheers > > Chaals > > > Best regards, > > Futomi > > > > > > On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:32:37 +0200 > > "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@myopera.com> wrote: > > > >> An alternative approach being proposed, essentially bringing the rest of > >> SMIL into SVG. Don't know where the thread went but it is worth looking > >> at. (IMHO it would make more sense to just add the SMIL elements). > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/mid/4F4306B0.3080103@mozilla.com > >> > >> cheers > >> > >> Chaals > >> > >> -- > >> Charles McCathie Nevile - private mail account > > > > -- > > Newphoria Corporation > > Chief Technology Officer > > Futomi Hatano > > -- > > futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp > > http://www.newphoria.co.jp/ > > > > > > > -- > Chaals - standards declaimer -- 株式会社ニューフォリア 取締役 最高技術責任者 羽田野 太巳 (はたの ふとみ) futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp http://www.newphoria.co.jp/
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 01:33:08 UTC