Re[2]: ??: Does anyone join me for writing as a co-editor?

Hi Chaals, Sunghan, and all,

Thank you for your opinion, Chaals.
You are right. I agree with you and Sunghan.
It's OK unless new suggestions will be denied.
So let's focus to listing use cases suggested at the workshop first of all.
I expect Sunghan's work!
Thank you in advance, Sunghan.

Best regards,
Futomi


On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:43:42 +0200
"Chaals McCathieNevile" <w3b@chaals.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:21:11 +0200, Futomi Hatano  
> <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Sunghan,
> >
> > Thank you very match for your help.
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 04:54:52 +0000
> > ??? <sh-kim@etri.re.kr> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Futomi,
> >>
> >> May i ask how did you determine the U1, Un in the section 4 of use  
> >> cases ?
> >> Is it from discussion of the last Web-based signage workshop ? or new  
> >> items from you ?
> >
> > It's my idea.
> > But I was inspired by the SMIL approach suggested at the workshop.
> > I'd like to make Web-based Signage work on ordinary web browsers.
> > Though SMIL isn't supported by web-browsers, the concept is useful.
> > So I'm thinking how to incorporate the concept into HTML smartly.
> 
> I think it is important to list the use cases before proposing the  
> solutions. It might turn out that implementing a SMIL library in  
> javascript is a better solution, or that the browsers decide to implement  
> native SMIL, or that there is a simpler solution using SVG (which is  
> native to browsers), or ...
> 
> >> I think that it is necessary to put some use cases of the workshop into  
> >> the document rather than other new ones.
> 
> Well, I think it is necessary to put the workshop use cases into the  
> document. If you have new ones, that is not a bad idea.
> 
> But use cases need to be real - things that someone is going to invest  
> their money in doing.
> 
> > I have not listed use cases in the document completely yet.
> > So I appreciate your help.
> >
> > Certainly, the use cases suggested at the workshop are important.
> > But I think that we don't need to summarize all suggestions.
> > The outcome of the workshop is not everything.
> > On a case-by-case basis, we might discard some use cases
> > if we conclude those are negligible.
> 
> Yes. But first we need to list them, so we can decide if they are  
> negligible or if they are important.
> 
> > Or we might put some use cases into the next step (if any).
> > Furthermore, we should discuss new use cases and solutions as well.
> > I'd like to accept new suggestions alongside.
> 
> Of course.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> >> If you agree the idea, i will try to fill for the section 4 under the  
> >> scope of the presentation materials, at first.
> >
> > Yes please.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chaals - standards declaimer

-- 
株式会社ニューフォリア
取締役 最高技術責任者
羽田野 太巳 （はたの ふとみ）
futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp
http://www.newphoria.co.jp/

Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 10:49:47 UTC