- From: Bassbouss, Louay <louay.bassbouss@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:44:27 +0000
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, "mark a. foltz" <mfoltz@google.com>, "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>
- CC: Anton Vayvod <avayvod@google.com>, Yuri Wiitala <miu@google.com>, "Derek Cheng" <imcheng@google.com>
Hi Anssi, Mark, > -----Original Message----- > From: Kostiainen, Anssi [mailto:anssi.kostiainen@intel.com] > Sent: Montag, 15. September 2014 16:35 > To: mark a. foltz; public-webscreens@w3.org > Cc: Anton Vayvod; Yuri Wiitala; Derek Cheng > Subject: Re: Two more issues for the tracker > > Hi MarkFo, Yuri, Anton, All, > > >From [1]: > > On 10 Sep 2014, at 21:01, mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com> wrote: > > > (2) Can the web developer make any assumptions about the dimensions of > the viewport for rendering the presentation? For example must it be a > minimum size, or must it match the aspect ratio of the display that is actually > rendering the content? I believe the aspect ratio constraint is the most > important, but I could also see that a minimum size would help Web authors > with layout and CSS. > > https://github.com/webscreens/presentation-api/issues/22 > > I think we should not specify any capability negotiation mechanism, and > instead, should continue to train web developers to craft their web content > in such a way that it can adapt to different screens, resolutions, aspect ratios > and so forth. > > To illustrate, if I happen to have my external screen tilted in its portrait > orientation, I wouldn't be very happy if some web content would refuse to > be shown on my screen before I tilt it back to landscape. [Louay] maybe we can introduce some preferred parameters (instead of filter parameters) that may influence the order of the available screens in the selection dialog. > > Thanks, > > -Anssi > > [1] https://github.com/webscreens/presentation-api/issues/2 > >
Received on Monday, 15 September 2014 14:45:00 UTC