- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 07:45:59 +0000
- To: "mark a. foltz" <mfoltz@google.com>
- CC: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, "Rottsches, Dominik" <dominik.rottsches@intel.com>, "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Anton Vayvod <avayvod@google.com>, Marco Chen <mchen@mozilla.com>, Wesley Johnston <wjohnston@mozilla.com>, Evelyn Hung <ehung@mozilla.com>
On 04 Sep 2014, at 22:28, mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com> wrote: > To clarify, I was proposing that the GH issue tracker would only be used to record the outcome of discussions that were resolved via mailing list, and not as a place where issues themselves should be discussed. This would prevent forked discussions among the subset of GH subscribers. That’s exactly what I meant :) > However, if there are interesting drive-by comments that originate on GH, then we should relay them to the mailing list and encourage the commenter to join the list. Agreed. We should encourage participation, and any feedback we get regardless of the medium should be considered and relayed to the mailing list. All group participants would be encouraged — but not required — to watch the repository, and could relay comments made on GH to the mailing list. Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Friday, 5 September 2014 07:47:39 UTC