- From: mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:02:10 -0700
- To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Cc: "Rottsches, Dominik" <dominik.rottsches@intel.com>, "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALgg+HEABedhq7JUJzMDxqnThKHOz7jqKwAZZTsbTPZQRC0Hyw@mail.gmail.com>
MarkW, Lines 234-236 read "The user agent is responsible for determining which secondary displays are compatible with the content that is requested to be shown through the API" which I think addresses your first suggestion. For the second suggestion, do you see this as something that must be addressed in the charter, or can it be addressed through the evolution of the API? (My assumption is that once the charter is agreed upon the currently proposed API will be re-examined to match the updated scope and deliverables.) If the former I welcome a pull request with what phrasing makes sense to you :) m. On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote: > Hi MarkF, all, > > In "API and associated specification", where we say "An API to allow a web > application to request display of web content on a connected display, with > a means to communicate with and control the web content from the initiating > page and other authorized pages", I think we should explicitly add > something like "and a means to discover when a display capable of rendering > the web content is available". > > This is the major requirement that is not presently supported by the API > draft: there is no way at present for the web page to determine whether it > should render the icon that shows the user a capable display is available > (and we have decided it should be the page that renders that icon, not the > UA). > > ...Mark > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Rottsches, Dominik < > dominik.rottsches@intel.com> wrote: > >> Hi MarkF, >> >> On 14 May 2014, at 23:02, mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com> wrote: >> >> > I pushed two more commits addressing your comments, […] >> >> Thanks, the additional explanations on “authorised pages” look good to >> me. I’d leave it to Anssi to merge, but fine from my point of view. >> >> Dominik >> >> >> > -- http://wiki/Main/OnlyCheckEmailTwiceADay
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2014 18:02:57 UTC