- From: Rottsches, Dominik <dominik.rottsches@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:23:43 +0000
- To: (wrong string) ˆ <duanyao@ustc.edu>
Hi Duan, > What did the "hooking it into Fullscreen API" approach look like in your > mind? and what requirements and use cases it couldn't match? The requestFullscreen() function does not allow a screen choice for example. Also, just the naming does not match what we want to do. requestFullscreen() is a feature of a DOMElement. There are additional issues with ¡°ripping out¡± a DOM element out of the one page, and placing it onto a remote screen. This would not work well in a two-UA implementation situation. So, starting with a new API seems like the better approach. > Do you think we still want a Fullscreen API like, partial mirroring API, > accompanied with the current Presentation API? App-level mirroring seems > still hard with current Presentation API, and some demos require > browsers' private APIs. If your content is downloaded from a web server, I think ¡°partial mirroring¡±, or showing the same content on two screens, nicely adapted to each screen's size and display resolution is not hard with Presentation API at it¡¯s current incarnation. So personally I don¡¯t think mirroring support in the API is a high priority. Dominik
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 14:24:18 UTC